Matic Spec vs Markos Kalovelonis Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W L W W L
Form
L L W L W W L L W LH2H: Spec 1 - 0 Kalovelonis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Spec winning 2 and Kalovelonis winning 0. The last match between Spec and Kalovelonis was at the M15 Belgrade, 03-07-2019, First, Clay with Matic Spec getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matic Spec | 1 |
| Markos Kalovelonis | 0 |
M15 Belgrade(03-07-2019)
6
4
7
5
| Spec | Stats | Kalovelonis |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (1-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 899 |
| 710 | Highest Rank | 445 |
| 30 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (167-95) | Career Total W/L | 49% (226-234) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bublik VS Rublev PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Spec VS Kalovelonis H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Matic Spec
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Spec VS Kalovelonis H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:3:0 | Average Match Time | 2:3:0 |
| 48% (27/56) | 1st Serve % | 67% (66/99) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (38/66) |
| 66% (19/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 24% (4/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 45% (45/99) | Return Points Win % | 29% (16/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Markos Kalovelonis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jadoun
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
13
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
16%
(
8 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Mikalai Haliak
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Tanakorn Srirat
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
98%
(
55 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
12 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
3)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (167/95) | Win/Loss | 49% (226/234) |
| 62% (364/222) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (532/534) |
| 55% (3011/2415) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (4996/5119) |
| 61% (94/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (159/156) |
| 66% (59/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (53/54) |
| 74% (14/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (14/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 440 | Aces Total | 1733 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 485 | Total Double Faults | 867 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:5:41 |
| 405.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 562.95 |
| 58% (5307/9198) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13507/22035) |
| 68% (3634/5307) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9213/13507) |
| 50% (1944/3893) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4253/8528) |
| 42% (440/1041) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (738/1855) |
| 42% (3922/9317) | Return Points Win % | 36% (7648/21122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 50% (28/28) |
| 64% (166/93) | Futures W/L | 49% (197/204) |
| 63% (163/258) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (225/453) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 56% (31/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (94/155) |
| 47% (30/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (68/146) |
| 91% (162/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (243/195) |
| 9% (162/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (243/48) |
| 19% (100/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (217/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
